Will SET exams be Scrapped?

Shahnawaz Khan ✉

OPINION

The academic evaluation arena in India, specifically for entry into research and teaching positions, has been significantly shaped by standardized exams like the National Eligibility Test (NET) and the State Eligibility Test (SET). 

Representative picture

Despite their roles in the academics of the country, there's an increasing debate over the need for the SET when the NET is already in place. This discussion pivots on the argument for eliminating the SET to promote transparency and achieve higher research standards nationwide. The eligibility criteria for PhD enrollment would be based on the categories A, B & C of NET recent rules amended by UGC. There should be enhancement of quota for NET seats and scrapping of SET at the same time. This article explores the rationale behind this proposition, examining the roles of both exams and making a case for the abrogation of the SET.

The Role of SET and NET

National Eligibility Test (NET): Conducted by the National Testing Agency (NTA) on behalf of the University Grants Commission (UGC), the NET is a national-level assessment designed to determine candidates' eligibility for assistant professor roles and Junior Research Fellowships (JRF) in Indian universities and colleges.

State Eligibility Test (SET): Administered by various states, the SET aims to establish eligibility for assistant professor positions within those states. While mirroring the NET's objectives, the SET is tailored to specific state requirements.

Despite their intentions to uphold teaching and research standards, the overlapping nature of these exams leads to systemic redundancies.

The Case for Abrogation

Duplication of Efforts

Both the NET and SET cover similar ground, leading to unnecessary duplications in preparation and execution. Candidates often find themselves navigating both exams, facing increased pressure and resource expenditure. Eliminating the SET could streamline the process, conserving time and resources for both candidates and administering bodies.

Uniformity in Standards

Centralizing the qualifying exam with the NET would ensure a consistent standard for academic positions across India. This move would address current discrepancies in evaluation, setting a unified benchmark for all candidates, and thereby fostering a more equitable academic environment.

Enhanced Transparency

A singular national-level exam would simplify monitoring and regulation, significantly reducing the potential for discrepancies and irregularities. This consolidation promises a fairer, more transparent selection process, instilling greater confidence among candidates and stakeholders alike.

Focus on Quality

The discontinuation of the SET would allow states to reallocate resources towards improving research quality and teaching excellence. Investments could be redirected into research infrastructure, faculty development, and innovation initiatives, enriching the academic landscape.

National Integration

Adopting the NET as the sole qualifying exam would encourage academic mobility across states, promoting a richer exchange of ideas and practices. This integration could play a crucial role in elevating the overall quality of higher education in India.

Conclusion

The initial rationale behind the SET—to cater to state-specific academic needs—has been overshadowed by the evolving demands for uniformity, transparency, and quality in the academic evaluation process. Abrogating the SET in favour of a singular NET with enhanced quota presents an opportunity to streamline the qualification process for research and teaching positions. Such a move not only promises a more efficient and transparent system but also aligns with the broader objectives of enhancing research standards and teaching excellence across the country. By consolidating the qualifying exams, we pave the way for a more integrated, equitable, and high-quality academic ecosystem.